Defending the ESA: A Look At The Attacks From Capitol Hill
In the wake of recent proceedings on Capitol Hill, it’s become increasingly apparent that the Endangered Species Act (ESA) – a landmark piece of legislation marking its 50th anniversary this year – is under fire from political factions seeking to undermine its profound and crucial role in biodiversity conservation.
In a hearing convened yesterday by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries, a disheartening number of anti-wildlife politicians seized the opportunity to direct unfounded assaults against the ESA. With an arsenal of misrepresentations and misunderstandings, these lawmakers sought to belittle the paramount achievements and ongoing necessity of this pivotal Act.
Dan Ashe, President and CEO of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), and former Director of the USFWS under President Obama, was among those that defended the ESA, acknowledging its historic successes and highlighting the political and environmental challenges it faces. With 40 years of experience in wildlife conservation, Ashe’s perspective offers valuable insights into the Act’s importance, current challenges, and future potential.
“The ESA has helped make the U.S. a global leader in biodiversity conservation,” Ashe testified. “[But] at 50, the law is in precarious political posture and is being asked to address challenges not envisioned when it was enacted or even when it was last reauthorized in 1992.”
The core challenges he outlined were twofold. First, the once solid bedrock of political support for the Act has significantly eroded. Secondly, the ESA is being confronted with environmental challenges like climate change and biodiversity loss on an unprecedented scale – challenges that weren’t anticipated when the Act was initially framed.
He emphasized the ESA’s crucial role amidst our planet’s ongoing mass extinction event, driven largely by human impact. He drew attention to how climate change, invasive diseases, and wildlife trafficking have introduced new, unexpected challenges to species conservation efforts. Ashe also pointed out the urgent need for increased funding for the agencies responsible for the Act’s implementation – the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries.
“Human ecology and economy is driving the planet’s sixth mass extinction event,” Ashe stated. “We cannot stop extinction, but we can slow it, and we can save some species from it. A strong and effective Endangered Species Act has never been more relevant and important. And in our view, the most important need is to adequately resource the agencies charged with its implementation.”
Amidst the fervor of political debate and anti-wildlife rhetoric, voices of reason and defense for the ESA did emerge. Notably, Reps. Jared Huffman (D-CA), Don Beyer (D-VA), Debbie Dingell (D-MI), Ira Magaziner (D-RI), and Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) highlighted the laws’ considerable successes. These include the recovery of the American peregrine falcon and bald eagle and preventing the permanent loss of the vast majority of listed species.
Adding her voice to the debate, Martha Williams, the current director of the USFWS, poignantly reminded us all that “the measure of success of the Endangered Species Act is about more than delisting a species.” This crucial point underscores the primary aim of the ESA: to protect and recover species at risk, safeguarding the biodiversity that is essential for a healthy planet.
Here at the Wolf Conservation Center, we’ve seen firsthand the ESA’s impact on protecting wolves in North America, and we remain staunch advocates of this powerful and essential law. In the face of political divisiveness and environmental challenges, the importance of the Endangered Species Act cannot be overstated. As we navigate the complex political landscape and confront the looming threat of a biodiversity crisis, we must rally behind this law that plays a crucial role in preserving the intricate tapestry of life on Earth.